ABSTRACT
Introduction: Surgical correction is the fundamental strategyfor severe rheumatic mitral regurgitation as (MR) as medicalmanagement for MR can not prevent the hemodynamicconsequences of severe MR in the asymptomatic andminimally symptomatic subjects. The purpose of this study isto assess the impact of duration of progressive rheumatic MRon LVEF, PH, LV and right ventricular dysfunction and decideabout the selection of optimal timing for surgical interventionin our patient population.Material and methods: This study involves the data of 30patients of MVR divided over 2 groups, from 1st January 2015to 31st December, 2018 and follow up of the survivors. Therewere (a) 12 cases of isolated severe MR described as MR and(b) 18 cases of severe MR associated with mild MS describedas MS +MR. Changes in echocardiographic parameters inboth the groups after MVR, LVEF, LVESD, LV end diastolicdiameter (LVEDD), PASP and NYHA functional class wereassessed, analyzed and compared at 30 and 180 days.Results: In the postoperative period after 30 days,improvement of NYHA status were observed to be higher in13 survivors with MS +MR from III to I while it was 6 in MRgroup. This improvement noted more in younger group below40 years. NYHA changes from III to II was observed in 4 ineach in both groups more in older group above 40 years. At180 days, 1 each from NYHA II improved to I in youngergroup. Out of the 2 post operative mortality, there was 1 in MRgroup who had post operative RV dysfunction and died afterdischarge on 29th day and 1 in MS+MR group and who diedof respiratory failure after 7 days though the cardiac indicesimproved and both were in older group.Conclusion: MVR can reversely remodel hearts and restoreLV function with relatively preserved LV.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Renal injuries account for up to 1–5% of alltrauma related injuries. Over the years there has been a shifttowards non-operative treatment for blunt renal trauma. Theaim of our study was to assess outcomes of patients managedconservatively (non-operatively) for high grade blunt renalinjury at our centre.Material and methods: The study was conducted in aretrospective manner using hospital records of last 5 years. Allpatients with blunt renal injuries were included. These patientswere categorized based on AAST(1989) injury gradingand further subdivided into operative and non-operativemanagement groups. These management strategies wereanalyzed in terms of ‘failure of non- operative management’,complications and need for adjunctive procedures. Descriptiveanalysis was done using Microsoft Excel(2010, ver14)software.Results: Forty three patients were included in the study witha mean age of 44.6 years. Out of the total, 28 had grade I– III injuries, 11 had grade IV and 4 had grade V injuries.All the grade I-III patients were managed conservatively andrequired no adjunctive procedures. One (9%) of grade IV and2(50%) of grade V injuries underwent immediate exploration.Out of 10 cases of grade IV injuries which underwent nonoperative management, 3(30%) required delayed explorationand none of the grade V injuries required delayed exploration.Complications included urinary tract infection (UTI) (6 cases),persistent hematuria (3 cases), hypertension(2 cases), urinoma(2 cases) and ileus(2 cases) .All complications were Claviengrade 1-2 with no mortalities overall.Conclusion: If the patient is hemodynamically stable,even grade IV and V blunt renal injuries can be managedconservatively, as is seen in our study where failure of nonoperative management occured in only 30% of grade IV andnone of the Grade V injuries.